British Policy

Trident Replacement:
Assessing UK Security Needs and Nuclear Policy

Back to the main page on UK Policy

Trident Replacement Articles and Publications, 2004-2005

See also: Trident Replacement Articles and Publications, 2006

• Public would reject new Trident if they knew huge costs, poll shows, Terry Kirby, The Independent, October 25, 2005
• MOD refuses information on Trident replacement, Greenpeace UK, October 21, 2005
• Labour fury as Blair fails to guarantee Trident vote, Toby Helm, Daily Telegraph, October 20, 2005
• Trident fleet faces stretched lifespan to help curb defence costs, Ian Bruce, October 19, 2005
• Revealed: Blair's Nuclear Bombshell, Andy McSmith, The Independent, October 18, 2005
• Trident's future 'linked to Iran', BBC News Online, October 11, 2005
• As the US lowers the nuclear threshold, debate is stifled, Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, October 5, 2005
• MoD shuns Trident debate, The Ministry of Defence refuses to release any documents relating to Trident replacement, Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, September 28, 2005
• Faslane 'vulnerable to terrorists', Scotsman, September 28, 2005
• Future of UK Nuclear Weapons, Tim Garden, September 22, 2005
• 'Britain should not withdraw its troops before next year', David Charter, Times Online, September 20, 2005.
• Nuclear Diplomacy: Handle with care, Guardian leader, September 20, 2005
• Call to scrap nuclear weapons, Scotsman, September 20, 2005
• Britain faces long-term nuclear threat and must plan for it, says Reid, Patrick Wintour and Martin Kettle, The Guardian, September 13, 2005
• Reid insists no decision yet on replacing ageing Trident, Scotsman, September 13, 2005
• Long live Trident? Malcolm Chalmers, Physics World, August 2005
• Can Britain find the courage to put Trident on the table? by Iain Macwhirter, The Herald, August 10, 2005.
  
• Worse than irrelevant, Replacing Trident is against both our national interests and our international obligations, Robin Cook, The Guardian, July 29, 2005
• Talks to start with US on Trident's £15bn successor by David Cracknell, The Sunday Times, July 17, 2005.
  
• A new generation of nuclear weapons? Let's talk about it, Marjorie Thompson and Julian Lewis, The Guardian, July 4, 2005
• Time to dismantle the cold war's nuclear legacy, Robin Cook and Robert McNamara, Financial Times, June 22, 2005
• It's no time to ban the bomb: Britain still needs its nuclear deterrent, Oliver Kamm, The Times, June 22, 2005
• Does Britain need nuclear missiles? No. Scrap them, Michael Portillo, Sunday Times, June 19, 2005
• Britain's special nuclear relationship, Mark Townsend, The Observer, June 12, 2005.
• Apocalypse sooner or later? Robert McNamara interviewed by Julian Borger, The Guardian, June 2, 2005
• The hunt for a new nuclear option, Tom Baldwin and Michael Evans, The Times, May 28, 2005
• America's broken nuclear promises endanger us all, Robin Cook, The Guardian, May 27, 2005
• PM-in-waiting plans to revitalise Labour, Larry Elliott and Ewen MacAskill, The Guardian, May 9, 2005
• One last chance to ensure world safety, Mary Riddel, The Observer, May 8, 2005
• Nuclear options, Leader, The Guardian, May 4, 2005
• Fears over 'replace Trident plan', BBC, May 3, 2005
• Brown refuses to back Blair's nuclear programme, Colin Brown and Andrew Grice, The Independent, May 3, 2005
• What Next for Trident? by Tim Hare, RUSI Journal, April 2005
• Its time for us to give up the nukes, Roy Hattersley, The Guardian, February 28, 2005
• MoD plans multibillion upgrade of nuclear subs by Jason Burke, The Observer, February 20, 2005.
• Yes, but why do you Brits need nuclear weapons? by Kevin Myers, The Sunday Telegraph, June 27, 2004.
• Does My Bomb Look Big in This? Britain's Nuclear Choices After Trident by Michael Clarke, International Affairs, Volume 80 Issue 1 Page 49 - January 2004.

See also: Trident Replacement Articles and Publications, 2006

Back to the Top of the Page

© 2006 The Acronym Institute.