Disarmament Diplomacy
Issue No. 66, September 2002
News Review
Controversial Nuclear Shipment Leaves Japan for Britain
On July 4, a ship carrying 560 pounds of mixed oxide (MOX)
uranium and plutonium left port in Takahama, Japan, bound for the
UK. In 1999, the material was shipped, for use in nuclear reactors,
to the Kansai Electric Power Company by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd
(BNFL). The Japanese company insisted on returning the consignment
after BNFL admitted providing false data on its condition.
Controversy and protest surrounded both the original shipment of
the material and the start of its two-month return journey. Critics
characterise the use of MOX for power generation as an
inappropriate use of fissile material, increasing the amount of
potentially weapons-grade plutonium and uranium available - and
subject to diversion, attack or theft - in the commercial sector.
Likewise, the transportation of such material over large distances
has been heavily criticised for running the risk of accident or
terrorist interdiction. As Irish Environment Minister Martin Cullen
complained (July 4): "This type of shipment is totally unacceptable
to the world at large and the international community... The
shipment of such materials through the Irish Sea represents an
unacceptable risk to the environment of Ireland and the health and
well-being of its population." A Greenpeace statement (July 4)
warned: "Security concerns are a major issue to countries along the
tens of thousands of kilometres between Japan and the United
Kingdom. The ships are slow, lightly armed, and vulnerable to armed
attack. The plutonium contained in this one cargo is sufficient for
fifty nuclear weapons if stolen." Both companies and governments
involved insist that sufficient security precautions have been
taken to prevent any incident.
Reports: Nuclear cargo ship leaves Japan, security
tight, Reuters, July 4; Japan defends nuclear fuel
decision, Associated Press, July 5.
Back to the Top of the Page
© 2002 The Acronym Institute.
|