Text Only | Disarmament Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM Reports
back to the acronym home page
Calendar
UN/CD
NPT/IAEA
UK
NATO
US
Space/BMD
CTBT
BWC
CWC
WMD Possessors
About Acronym
Links
Glossary

Disarmament Documentation

Back to the Index

US-Russia Arms Control Discussions, Washington, January 29

Russian Foreign Ministry Statement

'Russian-American Talks on Strategic Offensive Arms,' Russian Foreign Ministry Statement, Document 169-30-01-2002, January 30.

On January 29, the first round of Russian-US talks on the preparation of documents which are planned to be adopted in the course of the US President's visit to Russia this spring took place in Washington. The Russian interagency delegation was led by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Georgy Mamedov, and the American delegation by US Under Secretary of State John Bolton.

Mamedov was received by Secretary of State Colin Power, who expressed the hope that major results would be achieved in the course of the summit, reflecting the qualitatively new character of Russian-American relations in all fields.

The focus of the talks was the main elements proposed by the Russian side of a future Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms. It was stressed that this would be a legally binding document presupposing radical, real and reliably verifiable cuts in strategic offensive arms levels - down to ceilings of 1,700-2,200 nuclear warheads within 10 years.

The American side was simultaneously handed a draft declaration on ways of shaping new strategic relations between Russia and the USA, setting forth the principles and guidelines for such relations in the political, economic and military-strategic fields.

It has been agreed that the talks will be continued in Moscow on February 19.

Remarks by Deputy Foreign Minister Georgy Mamedov

'Transcript of Deputy Minister of Foreign affairs Georgy Mamedov live interview to the TC Channel ORT's Novosti (News) Program, January 30, 2002'; Russian Foreign Ministry transcript, Document 174-22-01-2002, January 30.

Question: Georgy Enverovich, what is it exactly that we are holding consultations with the American side on: the conclusion of a bilateral legally binding treaty, by which strategic nuclear weapons will be reduced to the levels agreed upon by the presidents in Texas, or will it all just come down to unilateral statements, the implementation of which is unverifiable?

Georgy Mamedov: Above all, I want to say that our delegation is satisfied with the results of the talks that we held in Washington. Notably talks, not consultations. We laid on the table proposals for a Draft Treaty on Radical Reduction of Strategic Offensive Arms and a Draft Declaration on New Strategic Relations between Russia and the USA. All these drafts accurately reflect the major accords which were reached between the Russian and US Presidents. The American side, as we could see from their reaction, appreciated this our initiative. About its importance the US Secretary of State told us when we met. In the United States they are all now waiting impatiently for the visit of President George W. Bush to Moscow and hope that important, yes, legally binding agreements on strategic arms and strategic stability will be reached.

Question: But how was the course of the talks affected by the USA's recently announced new nuclear strategy, by which it is planned to put a part of the nuclear warheads, and possibly delivery means as well, in storage at their places of liquidation? For in this case, rather than a reduction of nuclear weapons, one can actually speak only of their level of battle readiness being lowered?

Georgy Mamedov: We are carefully analyzing the just published results of a strategic survey of the USA. The Russian Ministry of Defense jointly with the US Defense Department have established special working groups which, starting this month, are already functioning and will continue their work. Besides, as a man who not for the first year has been participating in the negotiations to reduce strategic arms with the United States, I can say that this process was always complicated, but we are not starting from scratch. Between us there still operates the START I Treaty, which will bear a binding character for another 9 years. It prescribes clear-cut procedures which both sides are obliged to follow in the matter of eliminating strategic offensive arms. Under the new conditions, when we are reaching a radically lower arms level, a firm confidence is necessary. In the Draft Treaty, which we laid on the table during the talks in Washington, there are new proposals that are directed to ensuring precisely the liquidation of the carriers and the warheads alike.

© 2002 The Acronym Institute.