Text Only | Disarmament Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM Reports
back to the acronym home page
Calendar
UN/CD
NPT/IAEA
UK
NATO
US
Space/BMD
CTBT
BWC
CWC
WMD Possessors
About Acronym
Links
Glossary

Disarmament Documentation

Back to the Index

UK Green Paper on BWC, April 29

Note: the full text of the Green Paper - 'Strengthening the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention: Countering the Threat from Biological Weapons', published on April 29 - is available from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office at http://files.fco.gov.uk/npd/btwc290402.pdf.

Executive Summary

Work has been underway for many years to develop measures to make the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention more effective. The failure last year of the States Parties to agree on the text of a Protocol to the Convention was undoubtedly a disappointment. Despite this outcome it is still essential to find ways in which the Convention can be strengthened. This Green Paper explains why such efforts must continue (the proliferation of BW capabilities, advances in technology which could be misused and the terrorist threat). The paper identifies the following possible measures for consideration:

  • investigations into non-compliance with the Convention (alleged use of BW, misuse of facilities and suspicious outbreaks of disease).
  • assistance in the event, or threat, of use of BW.
  • national criminal legislation and extradition procedures: in those cases where they have not already done so, States Parties should pass national criminal legislation translating the prohibitions in the Convention into domestic law.
  • Scientific Advisory Panel: in view of the dramatic pace of technical change in the life sciences as described here, an open ended body of government and non-government scientists should meet every one or two years to review the rate of change and assess their implications for the Convention and measures being taken to strengthen it.
  • revised Confidence Building Measures (CBMs): existing CBMs should be revisited to see whether there is scope for improving and expanding their breadth and scope. Expanded CBMs might include more detailed voluntary exchanges on the level of information as well as voluntary visits to be agreed between participating States Parties to facilities notified under the existing or revised CBMs, or indeed to any facilities that it was agreed could be subject to visits, reciprocal or otherwise.
  • a new Convention on Physical Protection of dangerous pathogens: consideration should be given to the feasibility and desirability of establishing a new international agreement that would set standards for effective physical protection of dangerous pathogens held or worked upon in academic, government, industrial or research laboratories.
  • a new Convention on Criminalisation of CBW: there are already proposals, developed initially in the academic community, for a Convention that introduces criminal responsibility for any individual indicted for violating the prohibitions in the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention or the Chemical Weapons Convention.
  • increased efforts on disease surveillance, detection and diagnosis and countering infectious disease generally: this would be done through existing national and/or international channels.
  • codes of conduct: such codes would be developed by academic and professional bodies to lay out standards for work relevant to the prohibitions of the Convention.
  • promotion of universal membership of the BTWC.
  • withdrawal of reservations to the 1925 Geneva Protocol: States Parties to the Convention should be encouraged to withdraw any existing reservations they made on ratification or accession to the Convention regarding circumstances under which they reserved the right to use BW and CW.

The paper discusses UK priorities and the next steps ahead of the reconvened BTWC Fifth Review Conference and invites comments on the proposals outlined here and on any other ideas for strengthening the Convention and seeks views from MPs, NGOs, other organisations and individuals with an interest in this subject.

Back to the Top of the Page

© 2002 The Acronym Institute.