Text Only | Disarmament Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM Reports
back to the acronym home page
Calendar
UN/CD
NPT/IAEA
UK
NATO
US
Space/BMD
CTBT
BWC
CWC
WMD Possessors
About Acronym
Links
Glossary

Disarmament Documentation

Back to Disarmament Documentation

NATO Defence Ministers' Meeting, December 1-2, 2003

'Ministerial Meeting of the Defence Planning Committee and the Nuclear Planning Group', Brussels, December 1, 2003, excerpts.

  1. At our Nuclear Planning Group meeting, we reviewed the status of NATO's nuclear forces and the work of the High Level Group. It is a long-standing goal of the Alliance to enhance security and stability at the lowest possible level of forces consistent with its requirements for collective defence and the full range of its missions. In keeping with this goal, we continue to consider deterrence requirements for the 21 st century. We reaffirmed the principles underpinning NATO's security objectives as set out in the Alliance's Strategic Concept.
  2. The nuclear forces based in Europe and committed to NATO continue to provide an essential political and military link between the European and North American members of the Alliance. They are maintained at readiness levels consistent with the prevailing security environment. We noted with appreciation the continuing contribution made by the United Kingdom's independent nuclear forces to deterrence and the overall security of the Allies, and reaffirmed the value of this capability.
  3. We discussed the growing danger of the proliferation of nuclear weapons and expressed our serious concern over recent acts of non-compliance with obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which may have negative consequences for regional stability and security. We reaffirmed our full commitment to the NPT and to the goal of universal adherence to it. We recognized the NPT as the cornerstone of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime and reiterated our continuing commitment to all our obligations under this Treaty. We urge all nations to work together to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
  4. We reaffirmed the importance of substantial and productive exchanges by nuclear experts under the auspices of the NATO-Russia Council with a view to gaining better mutual understanding, more confidence and thereby increased security. We are encouraged by the progress achieved in these consultations, in particular the prospect of a series of field demonstrations on nuclear weapon safety and security issues.

Back to the Top of the Page

'Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Defence Ministers Session', Brussels, December 1, 2003.

  1. The North Atlantic Council met in Defence Ministers session on 1 December 2003. Defence Ministers and Representatives of the Allies were joined by their colleagues from the countries invited to join the Alliance.
  2. We are at an important juncture in the evolution of the Alliance. We are embarked on new operations, are developing greater capabilities and are preparing to admit seven new members. Against this background of continuing transformation, we discussed a wide range of matters of common interest, and concentrated on ongoing Alliance operations and crisis management issues, and progress in transforming NATO's military capabilities. We also discussed what must be accomplished in the defence field before the Istanbul Summit and gave direction for the necessary work.
  3. Our military capabilities must be able to respond rapidly and effectively, wherever the Alliance decides, to the challenges to our security, from wherever they may come, including the dangers posed by terrorism. We reviewed the valuable work that has been accomplished since the Prague Summit to this end, in particular progress in establishing the NATO Response Force, implementing the new command structure, and meeting the Prague Capabilities Commitment. The Alliance took special note of the establishment today of the NATO multinational Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defence Battalion. Increasing the deployability and usability of our forces is essential if we are to continue to fulfil our operational commitments. We have issued a separate statement regarding our discussions of these and other aspects of the ongoing transformation of our military capabilities.
  4. We are deeply grateful to all those who have taken part in NATO-led operations and offer our sincere condolences to the families and loved ones of those who have died in the line of duty. We also express our sympathy to all the victims of terrorism and resolutely condemn it in all its forms and wherever it occurs.
  5. In Afghanistan, the Alliance now leads the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) under its UN mandate. This operation demonstrates our readiness to deploy forces wherever the Alliance decides, to ensure our common security. Our aim is to assist in the emergence of a united, sovereign country, integrated into the international community, including by assisting the Afghan Transitional Authority in the maintenance of security and stability and in the electoral process according to the Bonn Process. We decided on the progressive expansion of ISAF beyond Kabul in accordance with UN Security Council resolutions, including through temporary deployments for specific tasks and limited in size and duration, provided all military conditions, and requirements for the Kabul mission, are met. We will continue to address the scope of such specific tasks. We welcome the German deployment of a pilot Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT), under ISAF, in Kunduz. Expecting that the establishment of additional PRTs will follow, we consider that ISAF could move to assume military command of such PRTs where consistent with military requirements and capabilities. Achievement of these objectives will be subject to consultations with and contributions from PRT framework nations and the provision of the required assets, including for Kabul International Airport. We will review NATO's contribution to stabilization efforts in Afghanistan on a regular basis. It is necessary to ensure close co-ordination and co-operation between ISAF and Operation Enduring Freedom, and also with the Afghan National Army. Our forces will also have to work closely with the UN Assistance Mission to Afghanistan and other international organisations on the ground, including the EU.
  6. The Alliance has made indispensable contributions to peace and stability in the Balkans, and we remain fully committed to these goals. In light of significant progress in Bosnia-Herzegovina, SFOR will reduce to a deterrent force of around 7,000 troops by next June. Over the coming months, we will consider how to adjust the operation further, including its possible termination by the end of 2004 and a transition possibly to a new NATO military liaison and advisory mission (NATO Headquarters Sarajevo) and to a new EU mission within the framework of the Berlin Plus arrangements; in this context, the NATO Military Authorities, keeping the Military Committee informed, should consult with their EU counterparts on Bosnia-Herzegovina, in accordance with agreed texts and procedures.
  7. In Kosovo, however, a large NATO force remains essential. KFOR continues to play an essential role in contributing to the maintenance of security and stability. It will be restructured but will not be reduced below 17,500 troops for the time being. NATO and the EU have agreed a concerted approach for the Western Balkans. In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, NATO's support to the EU's Operation Concordia, on which NATO has conducted its preliminary lessons learned process, successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the Berlin Plus arrangements. This confirms the value of close NATO-EU cooperation more generally. In the agreed framework of the NATO-EU strategic partnership, we will work to develop further our cooperation where necessary. NATO's Partners play a crucial role in NATO-led operations, which is but one instance of the importance of our Partnerships for Euro-Atlantic security.
  8. Operation Active Endeavour continues to make a significant and effective contribution to the fight against terrorism in the Mediterranean. To date the mission has hailed over 36,000 vessels, and has escorted almost 350 Allied civilian ships safely through the Straits of Gibraltar.
  9. The Alliance continues to support Poland in its leadership of a multinational division in Iraq. The North Atlantic Council will review NATO's contribution to the stabilization efforts in Iraq on a regular basis.
  10. Looking ahead to the Istanbul Summit, we have directed that:
    • the NATO Response Force should continue to be developed with a view to achieving initial operational capability as soon as possible but not later than October, 2004, and full operational capability not later than October, 2006; and to enable the effective use of this capability, measures should be pursued to increase the Alliance's ability, on the basis of thorough preparations, to prepare and launch operations quickly when the Alliance decides to act;
    • work should continue on the NATO multinational Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear defence battalion in order to achieve full operational capability from July 2004 onwards, together with the development of the NATO Response Force;
    • the implementation of the new command structure should continue according to the agreed implementation plan, resulting in a more effective and efficient structure. We look forward to achieving significant reductions in the peacetime establishments of the new command structure;
    • work to implement both the national and multinational aspects of the Prague Capabilities Commitment should continue as a matter of urgency with a particular focus on deployability and sustainability, and on addressing shortages in combat support and combat service support;
    • work on increasing the usability and deployability of the Allies' forces, including the development of output targets for both, and on the force generation process should continue as a matter of particular priority;
    • reports on these and other relevant aspects of efforts to transform NATO's military capabilities should be provided to the Heads of State and Government in Istanbul;
    • work should continue on the protection of deployed NATO forces against theatre ballistic missiles and on examining options for protecting Alliance territory, forces and populations centres against the full range of missile threats in an effective and efficient way through an appropriate mix of political and defence efforts, along with deterrence;
    • work on strengthening Partnership for Peace should continue to promote defence reform and transformation and the development of the capabilities necessary to improve the interoperability of Partner forces with NATO across the full range of missions which Partners and Allies might carry out together ;
    • the review of NATO agencies agreed at the Prague Summit is to be completed in time for a final report to Ministers in December 2004.
  11. We wish to thank Lord Robertson of Port Ellen warmly for his leadership role in guiding NATO's transformation. We are confident that the new Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, will continue to carry forward NATO's transformation, and build on the Alliance's record of success, and pledge our full support to him.

Back to the Top of the Page

Statement on Capabilities issued at the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Defence Ministers Session, excerpts

6. A year has passed since the Heads of State and Government endorsed a set of nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) weapons defence initiatives; work on them is now well advanced, transforming prototypes into Alliance capabilities. The operational fielding of the NBC Analytical Laboratory and the Joint Assessment Team has been accelerated, and the concept for a NATO multinational Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defence Battalion capability has been developed. The first such battalion, under the leadership of the Czech Republic and with contributions from a total of 13 nations, has today achieved its initial operational capability and will reach full operational capability in July 2004. Other rotations of the multinational battalion will follow, under the leadership of other Allies, and will continue to make an important contribution to the NATO Response Force and to the Alliance's capability to address NBC threats.

7. Following the decision by our Heads of State and Government in Prague, we initiated a new NATO missile defence feasibility study which will examine options for protecting Alliance territory, forces and population centres against the full range of missile threats. Excellent progress has been made, and we are pleased to report that the feasibility study is now under contract, with an expected duration of 18 months. It will address critical issues such as command and control architecture, and the optimum mix of planned and existing systems and capabilities. We will also continue work on Active Layered Theatre Ballistic Missile Defence.

Back to the Top of the Page

Meeting of the NATO-Russia Council at the level of Ministers of Defence NATO Headquarters, Brussels, 1 December 2003

  1. We, the Defence Ministers of the NATO-Russia Council, met in Brussels on 1 December 2003. Encouraged by the concrete progress achieved to date in the NRC framework, we are determined to build on achievements and to develop the means we need to act jointly in the face of common threats and challenges. On that basis, we renewed our commitment to deepening our engagement towards a wide-ranging NATO-Russia partnership on defence and military issues.
  2. On cooperation against terrorism, we welcomed the progress achieved on threat assessments. We urged further work on practical aspects of our fight against terrorism, and called for the development of concrete measures to facilitate rapid cooperation in response to future terrorist incidents, and welcomed the proposal by Supreme Allied Commander Transformation to host the third conference at senior level in this field, in Norfolk, in March 2004.
  3. We look forward to the completion of a joint assessment of global trends in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery as a first and significant step towards a comprehensive and regular exchange of views among NRC countries. We agreed to continue broadening the current NATO-Russia non-proliferation dialogue in support of efforts against proliferation of nuclear, biological and chemical agents and their delivery means, and to further explore possibilities for practical cooperation.
  4. We welcomed the Russian invitation to NRC countries to observe a field exercise on safe handling procedures for nuclear weapons, as part of the ongoing consultations on nuclear weapons issues and implementation of the NATO-Russia Nuclear Experts' Consultations Work Plan for 2004.
  5. We applauded the progress achieved in taking forward the proposal to conduct a NATO-Russia procedural exercise designed to address the Political Aspects of a Generic Concept of Joint NATO-Russia Peacekeeping Operations, and welcomed in this context the successful completion of the preparatory phase of this exercise. We welcomed the decision to take forward the recommendations, resulting from an NRC peacekeeping seminar last September in Berlin on training and interoperability, which will enable closer cooperation between NATO and Russia in this realm. We look forward to exploring possibilities of developing interoperability between national military units in the field of peacekeeping.
  6. We noted with satisfaction the progress made in carrying forward Theatre Missile Defence (TMD) cooperation, particularly from the perspective of developing procedures for cooperation between NATO and Russian TMD forces in crisis response operations. We welcomed specifically the development of an experimental TMD concept and an experimental Concept of Operations, and the conduct of a Command Post Exercise scheduled in early 2004, and stressed the importance of a joint interoperability study launched this year, which will analyse and evaluate possible levels of interoperability of TMD systems.
  7. We welcomed the approval of the Cooperative Airspace Initiative (CAI) Project Plan and encouraged the group to progress further on the identification of possible solutions for the reciprocal exchange of data on civil and military air traffic pictures, and thereby enhance capabilities to combat terrorism threats to civil aviation.
  8. We noted the progress achieved in implementing our first yearly programme on defence reform and agreed a new Work Programme for 2004. We welcomed exchanges on the financial and budgetary aspects of defence reform, as well as the geographic and functional expansion of the NATO-Russia Retraining Centre, and encouraged further intensification of our efforts in these areas. We reiterated our determination to enhance practical work on military-technical cooperation through its defence industrial and research and technology dimensions. Finally, we agreed to develop measures to enhance transparency in defence planning and force structures to address jointly ongoing efforts at development and modernisation of our armed forces. We agreed to explore what instruments could be used to increase the interoperability and deployability for joint operations of NATO and Russian forces.
  9. We stressed that improving interoperability was a key priority in order to increase the capability of NATO and Russian forces to act together. In this context, we welcomed the Exercise and Training Programme agreed for 2004 and beyond under the direction and oversight of the NATO Chiefs of Defence Staff and the Chief of the Russian General Staff, as well as the practical activities agreed in the framework of the 2004 Work Programme on Cooperation on Search and Rescue at Sea. We also welcomed the imminent start of discussions on the development of protocols for visits by NATO and Russian naval units to each other's ports.
  10. In the field of interoperability and with the aim of facilitating joint action, we agreed to take forward a coherent and unified programme of logistic cooperation, including ongoing projects on air-to-air refuelling and the use of Russian transport capability. We agreed to facilitate the development of the necessary legal framework for such cooperation, including through the development of Memoranda of Understanding on Air Transport and Host Nation Support. We welcomed the readiness of the Russian Federation and NATO to conclude a Status of Forces Agreement as a critical step towards joint military activities, and urged the rapid completion of negotiations in the near future.
  11. As a further demonstration of an ever-deepening NATO-Russia relationship, we welcomed the establishment of a direct secure telephone communication link between the Secretary General and the Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation. We conveyed our special gratitude to the Chairman of the NATO-Russia Council, Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, for his personal contribution to the development of a new quality in NATO-Russia cooperation. We are confident that the new chairman, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, will continue to build on this record of success.

Source: NATO, http://www.nato.int.

Back to the Top of the Page

© 2003 The Acronym Institute.