Text Only | Disarmament Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM Reports
back to the acronym home page
Calendar
UN/CD
NPT/IAEA
UK
NATO
US
Space/BMD
CTBT
BWC
CWC
WMD Possessors
About Acronym
Links
Glossary

Disarmament Documentation

Back to Disarmament Documentation

NATO Foreign Ministers' meetings, December 9, 2004

Final Communiqué Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council held at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, on 9 December 2004

  1. Today, we reviewed progress in implementing the Istanbul Summit decisions, discussed the key security challenges facing the Alliance, and agreed on measures to enhance Alliance operations. We reaffirm the enduring value of the transatlantic link and of NATO as the basis for our collective defence and the essential forum for security consultation between Europe and North America, to defend our shared security and common values. We strongly condemn terrorism, whatever its motivations or manifestations, and will fight it together as long as necessary.

  2. Contributing to peace, stability and democracy in Afghanistan, through the UN-mandated, NATO-led International Security Assistance Force, remains the Alliance's key priority. We welcome the progress already made towards implementing our decision to expand ISAF's presence into the West of the country and are resolved to accelerate this expansion to support the Afghan Government to meet the challenges of the parliamentary elections scheduled for next Spring. As with the 9 October presidential elections, we also decided to provide additional support for the parliamentary elections. Our engagement, within ISAF's mandate, and in cooperation with other international organisations and Operation Enduring Freedom, is essential to assisting and encouraging the Afghan Government to enhance the security of the Afghan people and confront the challenges posed by narco-trafficking, by insurgents and by the disarming of all local militias, while pursuing reconstruction, institution-building and national reconciliation. We stand ready to continue this engagement after the present Bonn process.

  3. Kosovo has entered a critical period in its evolution. We urge all of Kosovo's communities to participate in its institutions and to take their share of responsibility for building a better, common future. Kosovo, and especially the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government, must make concrete progress to meet the standards set out by the international community; this progress will be reviewed next year. As the security environment remains fragile, we have agreed that KFOR will maintain its operational capabilities until we assess that improved security and political circumstances allow for change. A robust KFOR will continue to contribute effectively to a secure, stable and multi-ethnic Kosovo on the basis of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244. We will also continue to cooperate closely with other actors from the international community, in particular UNMIK, the OSCE and the European Union. We agree that NATO should remain engaged not only operationally in the region, but politically as well, including through participation in the Contact Group Plus.

  4. As we agreed in Istanbul, we remain united in our support for the Iraqi people and offer full cooperation to the Iraqi Interim Government as it seeks to strengthen internal security and prepare the way to national elections in 2005. In accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546, and at the request of the Iraqi Interim Government, we are helping the Government by providing training and assisting with the equipping of its security forces, so that Iraq can assume full responsibility for its own security as soon as possible. Our mission is distinct from, yet complementary to, other international efforts. We have already begun training both in and outside of the country, and have today agreed to enhance our assistance. This enhanced support will include assisting the Government with the establishment of their Training, Education and Doctrine Centre near Baghdad, and coordinating the offers of equipment by NATO nations and other countries in response to Iraqi requests. We continue to support Poland in its leadership of the multinational division in south central Iraq.

  5. NATO's long-term commitment to Bosnia and Herzegovina remains undiminished. Our SFOR mission in the country, the Alliance's first-ever peacekeeping operation, has now reached a successful conclusion. The European Union's assumption of the main peace stabilisation role with its Operation Althea, based on the Berlin+ arrangements, is a milestone in the developing NATO-EU relations. A substantial NATO HQ Sarajevo is providing advice on defence reform, as well as undertaking its remaining operational supporting tasks in coordination with the EU as previously outlined.

  6. We reaffirm our support for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all the countries in the Western Balkans and remain committed to the development of a peaceful, stable and democratic region, fully integrated into Euro-Atlantic structures. These countries must continue to cooperate in their own region and promote good-neighbourly relations, find mutually acceptable solutions and reach agreements on outstanding issues. They have to assume ownership of the reform process and build enduring multi-ethnic democracies, combat organised crime and corruption, and firmly establish the rule of law. They must also cooperate fully with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), including bringing to justice in The Hague all those who are indicted by the Tribunal, notably Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, as well as Ante Gotovina, in accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1503 and 1534. In this context, we are deeply concerned by the most recent assessment provided to the United Nations Security Council by the Prosecutor of the ICTY on the level of cooperation she is receiving from the countries concerned.

  7. We urge Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia and Montenegro to make further progress in meeting the established conditions for membership in the Partnership for Peace (PfP). We continue to believe that improvements in security and law enforcement structures in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as called for in Istanbul, are required. Although Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia and Montenegro have made some progress since Istanbul on defence reform, neither country is fulfilling its international obligations to cooperate fully with the ICTY. We share the concerns recently expressed by the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina regarding the continued failure by those in the Republika Srpska to fulfil its obligations, including under the Dayton/Paris Accords. While we remain ready to pursue a political dialogue with both countries on all aspects of our relationship and to include them in selected PfP activities, we will consider their applications for membership in PfP after they have met the established conditions.

  8. We welcome the progress made by Albania, Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in implementing their Annual National Programmes under the Membership Action Plan, and encourage them to continue pursuing the reforms necessary to progress towards NATO membership.

  9. We are grateful to our Partner countries for their continued contribution to our operations. We welcome the response by many of our Partners to the new opportunities for cooperation with NATO agreed at the Istanbul Summit, including the Partnership Action Plan on Defence Institution Building, as well as the progress made on concluding Individual Partnership Action Plans. We welcome the appointment by the Secretary General of a Special Representative for Central Asia and the Caucasus and progress towards appointing NATO Liaison Officers in those regions. We want to further strengthen the Euro-Atlantic Partnership and look forward to the first EAPC Security Forum in Sweden in May 2005 as an important new step in our cooperation.

  10. We are determined to build upon the increasing political dialogue and greater practical focus of NATO-Russia cooperation in the framework of the NATO-Russia Council. We encourage Russia's early accession to the PfP Status of Forces Agreement. We welcome agreement on the NRC Action Plan on Terrorism and Russia's support to Operation Active Endeavour, NATO's maritime operation in the Mediterranean aimed at helping to deter, defend, disrupt and protect against terrorism.

  11. We reiterate our commitment to the CFE Treaty as a cornerstone of European security and to the early entry into force of the Adapted Treaty, which would permit accession by new States Parties. We recall that fulfilment of the remaining Istanbul commitments on the Republic of Georgia and the Republic of Moldova will create the conditions for Allies and other States Parties to move forward on ratification of the Adapted CFE Treaty. Given the lack of progress in 2004 on withdrawal of Russian military forces from the Republic of Moldova it is essential that efforts be intensified to complete the withdrawal as soon as possible. We urge the resumption of substantive negotiations between Georgia and the Russian Federation to resolve the outstanding issues related to their 17 November 1999 Istanbul Joint Statement.

  12. We attach particular importance to relations between NATO and Ukraine as reaffirmed in Istanbul and are closely following developments in the country. We call on all parties to move quickly to implement the reform of the electoral law passed by the Verkhovna Rada and signed by President Kuchma on 8 December and to ensure that the re-running of the second round of the presidential elections on 26 December will be free and fair, and that its outcome accurately reflects the will of the people of Ukraine without interference into its internal affairs. We support the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, and call on all sides to avoid violence and to promote democracy. The Ukrainian authorities have a special responsibility in this respect.

  13. Yesterday we celebrated the 10th anniversary of the Mediterranean Dialogue and held the first-ever ministerial level meeting with our Mediterranean partners. We welcome, and share, their interest in establishing a more ambitious and expanded partnership, by deepening our political consultations and practical cooperation in a spirit of joint ownership and inclusiveness. We appreciate the interest of several Mediterranean partners in supporting Operation Active Endeavour.

  14. We welcome the growing interest that a number of countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council have shown in the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative. We look forward to building relations with interested countries in a spirit of joint ownership, and to developing and implementing with them work plans focusing on those areas where NATO can add value, on the basis of our agreement at Istanbul.

  15. The support of our parliaments remains essential for the implementation of the Alliance's agenda. We applaud the joint meeting of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly in plenary session and the North Atlantic Council in Permanent Session in Venice in November.

  16. At the Istanbul Summit, the Alliance's leaders laid out a broad programme of transformation. We welcome the ongoing work to carry it forward, including through improvement of NATO management and funding arrangements. We are also grateful to the Government of Belgium for taking the lead in the construction of the new NATO Headquarters, which will provide a fitting venue to carry forward the work of the Alliance into the future.

Statement Meeting of the NATO-Russia Council at the level of Foreign Ministers NATO Headquarters, Brussels, December 9, 2004

We, the Foreign Ministers of the NATO-Russia Council, met in Brussels on 9 December 2004. We welcomed the notable progress that has been achieved in implementing the decisions taken at our last meeting on 28 June 2004 in Istanbul, and reiterated our determination to build upon the solid foundations we have established, by seeking ever greater opportunities to intensify our political dialogue and further develop our practical cooperation in the spirit of the May 2002 Rome Declaration. We noted with satisfaction the growing practical and operational character of NRC cooperation. We underscored the need to develop further our ability to work together in concrete ways to respond quickly and efficiently to an increasing number of emerging threats to the security and well-being of our peoples, and pledged once again to contribute to the security of all in the Euro-Atlantic area.

Continuing the political consultations conducted in 2004 on the situations in Afghanistan, in the Balkans, in Georgia and in Iraq, we exchanged views on current international security issues.

With respect to the situation in Ukraine, we took note of the steps taken by all parties toward resolution of the political crisis in accordance with the rule of law and Ukraine's constitutional norms. We appealed to all parties to continue to avoid the use or instigation of violence, to refrain from intimidation of voters, and to work to ensure a free, fair electoral process that reflects the will of the Ukrainian people. We reiterated our support for the independence, the sovereignty, the territorial integrity of and democracy in Ukraine. This is vital for the common and indivisible security and stability of all.

We reiterated our solidarity in the face of the terrorist threat, and our determination to strengthen our cooperation in preventing, combating and managing the consequences of terrorist acts, acting in accordance with the UN Charter, international law and human rights. We were pleased to take two concrete decisions to transform this political will into action. We approved a comprehensive NRC Action Plan on Terrorism, which will guide our future efforts in all aspects of this common struggle, and welcomed agreement on the modalities of Russian contribution to NATO Operation Active Endeavour in the Mediterranean Sea aimed at helping deter, defend, disrupt and protect against terrorism. In this context, we noted with particular satisfaction that NATO and Russian military forces already have begun preparing to serve side by side in this operation.

We reiterated our determination to work to promote security and stability in and around Afghanistan, and welcomed Russia's offer to provide practical support to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). We also expressed concern over threats posed by the narcotics industry in Afghanistan, including its links to the financing of terrorism. In this context, we noted the Report of the Chairman of the October 2004 NRC Seminar on threats posed by trafficking in Afghan narcotics, and approved the recommendations contained therein, agreeing to explore further NATOï·"Russia cooperation in this area.

We noted ongoing work in the field of crisis management, and in particular the successful conduct of the NATO-Russia Procedural Exercise in September. Taking into account principles contained in the Generic Concept for Joint NATO-Russia Peacekeeping Operations, we are determined to seek appropriate ways to develop and build upon lessons learned from this exercise, in order to ensure the success of any future joint peacekeeping operations.

We were particularly content to note the continued intensification of cooperation among our military forces, and the adoption of an ambitious Work Plan for 2005 and Beyond to guide the future work of NRC Military Representatives. In addition to increasing the interoperability levels of our forces, such efforts also help build the mutual understanding and trust necessary for a meaningful, sustainable partnership. We stressed the importance of NRC cooperation on defence reform, and welcomed the October 2004 agreement by NRC Defence Ministers on an initial framework for Political-Military Guidance towards Enhanced Interoperability between Russian and NATO Forces. In this context, we looked forward to Russia's early accession to the Partnership for Peace Status of Forces Agreement, which would facilitate intensified joint training and other forms of practical cooperation.

We agreed to build upon the success of the June 2004 civil emergency response exercise "Kaliningrad 2004" by developing a joint exercise programme in this area and developing further the Hungarian-Russian initiative on civil emergency planning and response. We also welcomed the success of "Avariya 2004", the field demonstration on nuclear weapon accident/incident response procedures hosted by the Russian Federation in August 2004, and the offer of the United Kingdom to host a similar event in September 2005.

We noted progress in our ongoing efforts to broaden and strengthen cooperation in evaluating and responding to threats posed by the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and their means of delivery. We further decided to initiate practical cooperation on protection from NBC agents. We look forward to a full report in the autumn of 2005 on the results of focused expert discussions of specific opportunities for such cooperation .

Finally, we recalled all relevant statements, reaffirmed the 4 June 2003 Statement of NRC Foreign Ministers in Madrid, and recalled NATO's position on providing political assurances of restraint. We also reaffirmed adherence to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) as a cornerstone of European security. We reaffirmed our determination to fulfil the commitments reflected in the Final Act of the 1999 Conference of the States Parties to the CFE Treaty. Calling upon all CFE States Parties to promote achievement of this shared goal, we agreed to continue work co-operatively toward ratification by all the States Parties and entry into force of the Agreement on Adaptation of the CFE Treaty, which would permit accession by non-CFE states. We welcomed the approach of the four non-CFE member states, who have stated their intention to request accession to the adapted CFE Treaty upon its entry into force, and agreed that their accession would provide an important additional contribution to European stability and security. We reaffirmed our readiness to pursue work in the field of arms control and confidence-building measures.

Source: NATO website, http://www.nato.int.

Back to the Top of the Page

© 2003 The Acronym Institute.