Fissile Material talks (Fissban)
Pakistan Statement, 11 August 1998
'Fissile Material Treaty', Statement from Munir Akram,
Ambassador of Pakistan
- Pakistan is happy that the CD has been able to adopt a decision
to establish an ad hoc Committee to negotiate a Treaty on Fissile
Material based on the Shannon Report.
Mr President,
- A Fissile Material Treaty has been a long-standing goal of the
international community. Para 50 of the Final Declaration of SSOD-I
called for a ban on the production of fissile material as part of
the measures for nuclear disarmament, the creation of NWFZs and a
time-bound programme for the elimination of nuclear weapons. We
continue to adhere firmly to this long-standing international
consensus. It is the attempt to deny or compromise this consensus
which has delayed the commencement of negotiations on a Fissile
Material Treaty.
- As the discussions and consultations of the past two weeks have
confirmed, there are some fundamental differences among members of
the CD on the purpose and scope of the FMT. A few States --
including the 5 NWS and one self-declared NWS -- wish to restrict
the proposed ban on fissile materials only to future production.
The vast majority of the CD;s membership continues to adhere to the
long-standing consensus that the FMT must address the issue of
stockpiles of fissile material possessed by some States and,
through their progressive and balanced reduction, to promote the
goal of nuclear disarmament. The Treaty should not be, once again,
a measure for nuclear non-proliferation alone.
- Therefore, my delegation does not agree to the Treaty being
described as a fissile material "Cut-off" Treaty, implying only a
halt in future production. We cannot endorse the loose abbreviation
- FMCT - in any formal description of the Treaty which is to be
negotiated by the CD.
- The existence of unequal stockpiles of fissile material in
South Asia was always an issue of central importance since it
threatened to destabilise the situation of "existential" or
"non-weaponised" deterrence between India and Pakistan. This issue
has become even more critical in the wake of India's declaration
that it is now a nuclear weapon State and that it will produce and
deploy nuclear weapons for what it calls "minimum deterrence". We
can therefore only presume that India will transform its
large fissile material stocks into nuclear weapons. This will
accentuate the threat to stability and security in South Asia. In
calculating the balance required to maintain deterrence vis-a-vis
India and Pakistan, we shall need to take into account both India's
nuclear weapons and fissile material stockpiles. We cannot
therefore agree to freeze inequality, specially when this directly
threatens our security. It is for this reason that Pakistan has
asked for a clarification -- before commencing negotiations --
about India's nuclear status. Unfortunately, the response that has
been given is legalistic rather than realistic. We shall therefore
need to factor the "new realities" into our negotiations on the
FMT.
Mr President,
- A decision on the scope of the treaty will be essential to
determine the nature of the Treaty and its provisions for
verification and compliance. We shall need to proceed step by step
in evolving agreement on the FMT.
- The negotiations we will commence in the ad hoc committee on
the FMT will be complex, arduous and time-consuming.
- But, at this stage, we wish to affirm what has been stated by
the G-21 in the informal consultations. The FMT is not the highest
priority for the Group. As the coordinator of the G-21 has just
stated, the realisation of nuclear disarmament enjoys the highest
priority in our pantheon of the purposes of the CD. Together with
the G-21, Pakistan will continue to seek the early establishment of
an ad hoc Committee to negotiate on nuclear disarmament. We have
proposed specific measures for nuclear disarmament, including a
Convention to commit all States to the elimination of nuclear
weapons. We hope this will be taken up by the CD in the near
future. We expect that the NWS will be responsive to the desires
and hopes of the vast majority of mankind in pursuing nuclear
disarmament, specially in this sole multilateral negotiating forum
on disarmament.
Thank you, Mr President.
Back to the Top of the Page
© 2003 The Acronym Institute.
|