| Acronym Institute Home Page | Calendar | UN/CD | NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |
| CTBT | BWC | CWC | WMD Possessors | About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
The panel's verdict was revealed to the Senate Intelligence Committee by its Chair, former CIA Director Robert Gates, who stated (4 December):
"[We have] found no evidence of politicization... [If anything, there was] too much of a hands-off approach by senior intelligence community management in the preparation of the estimate."
Gates concluded that this 'hands-off' approach meant that the NIE was "politically naive and not as useful as it could have been" - a significant crumb of Republican comfort. Gates, however, was satisfied with the asssessment of the likely threat from one 'rogue' State, North Korea:
"North Korea is one of the areas where we felt the chain of analysis within the intelligence community was very strong... [North Korea's ballistic missile programme] is going more slowly than was anticipated in 1993."
The NIE's conclusions were defended by NIC Vice-Chair John McLaughlin, also addressing the Senate Committee on 4 December:
"[No State will] develop or acquire ballistic missiles capable of reaching the contiguous 48 States or Canada by 2010... unauthorized launch of Chinese or Russian missiles remains...a remote possibility...[but one] that we would become more concerned about...in the event of a severe internal crisis in either country."
Reports: Threat from Russian, Chinese missiles is deemed remote, United States Information Agency, 5 December; North Korea still far from developing ICBM, AP Datastream Washington News Wire, 5 December; Committee finds long-range missile threat report not politicised, Armed Forces Newswire Service, 5 December.
© 1999 The Acronym Institute.