| This page with graphics | Disarmament Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM Reports |

| Acronym Institute Home Page | Calendar | UN/CD | NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |

| CTBT | BWC | CWC | WMD Possessors | About Acronym | Links | Glossary |

Space without Weapons

Back to the Acronym Institute home page

The world now relies on outer space for important security and development purposes such as meteorology, environmental monitoring and disaster prevention, communications, education, entertainment and treaty verification.

There are already a number of international treaties and instruments with jurisdiction over space activities, but they do not adequately cover the challenges posed by space-based weapons and missile defence. Though some prohibit or restrict the deployment of weapons or use of force in outer space, the provisions are limited in scope and coverage. None of the existing legal instruments unequivocally prevents the testing, deployment and use of weapons other than nuclear, chemical and biological, in outer space. Nor does any relevant legal instrument cover the use of force or threat of use of force against a country's assets in outer space. The placement of nuclear weapons in space is prohibited under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, but nuclear-warheads on missile defence interceptors launched from the ground into space are not prohibited.

Following the Bush administration's policies aimed at space domination and control, the Obama administration is committed to support a ban in weapons in space. The collision of two satellites in February 2009, creating an estimated 10,000 pieces of debris, highlighted the need for 'rules of the road' of some form of code of conduct for space.

The Obama administration is currently reviewing its position on missile defence. However, Obama has emphasised the need for any system to be "proven and cost effective" - conditions widely interpreted as putting missile defence at a lower priority than it was for the Bush administration. Obama faces decisions concerning the future of agreements signed by the outgoing Bush administration with the Czech Republic and Poland concerning siting of missile defence interceptors. Missile defence also continues to exacerbate US-Russia relations with Russia demanding that it is addressed as part of the current Strategic reduction talks. In February Obama reportedly wrote to Russian President Medvedev suggesting a deal with Russia on missile defence in exchange for Russia's support in resolving the Iranian nuclear crisis, however, Russia denies any linkage between these issues.

Latest Additions

Europe's Space Policies and their relevance to the EU's Security and Defence Policy (ESDP)

The following study, written by Rebecca Johnson on behalf of the Acronym Institute and ISIS-Europe, with research assistance from Stephen Pullinger and Aline Dewaele, was commissioned in 2006 by the European Parliament Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union.

"The study analyses Europe's space programmes and argues for an effective European Space Policy to manage the civil-military interface and national-regional interests to enable Europe to benefit from a more effective coordination of technologies and assets for the purpose of enhancing European and international security, while preventing destabilising developments, such as the testing, deployment or use of anti-satellite weapons or weapons in and from space.

Articles and Publications

Official Documents

Back to the Top of the Page

© 2009 The Acronym Institute.