| Acronym Institute Home Page | Calendar | UN/CD | NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |
| CTBT | BWC | CWC | WMD Possessors | About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
"I can only describe it as an ecological crime... The military will have their excuse, but the sea will be poisoned for years. I am astonished at the Americans' approval."
Greenpeace claimed the missiles were powered by liquid fuel; the authorities said they were in fact propelled by solid fuel.
According to Vyacheslav Romanov, head of the Defence Ministry's National Centre for Nuclear Threat Reduction, speaking to Itar-Tass on 10 December, the method of destruction was by far the cheapest available, saving over 40 billion roubles. Romanov added that the destruction was timed to coincide with weather conditions likely to prevent any environmental contamination.
The destruction was reportedly observed by 7 US weapons inspectors.
Reports: Russia to destroy 20 ballistic missiles in December, Itar-Tass, 2 December; Russia destroys submarine missiles, Associated Press, 3 December; Russia begins scrapping ICBMs under START -1 Treaty, Itar-Tass, 3 December; Russians demolish 20 submarine ballistic missiles, Itar-Tass, 11 December.
© 1998 The Acronym Institute.