| This
page with graphics | Disarmament
Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM
Reports |
| Acronym Institute Home Page
| Calendar | UN/CD
|
NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |
| CTBT | BWC
| CWC | WMD Possessors
| About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
Disarmament Diplomacy
Issue No. 24, March 1998
Editor's Introduction
The March issue features two contributions from Bradford
University's Department of Peace Studies. Professor Paul Rogers
reflects on the recent, narrow avoidance of war in Iraq and ponders
the likely longevity and satisfactoriness of the agreement secured
by the UN Secretary-General. Rogers argues that Iraq should not be
seen as an isolated or exceptional case: "[C]rises involving
weapons of mass destruction acquired by intermediate States are
likely to occur in the coming years. Iraq is, in a sense, a model
for future crises, and as with Iraq, it should not be assumed that
such crises are readily amenable to military solutions." Nicola
Short subjects the December 1997 Ottawa Landmines Convention, and
the often euphoric and grand claims made for the 'Ottawa Process'
which produced it, to wide-ranging and critical scrutiny, arguing
that "the treaty is weak in areas of traditional NGO
[Non-Governmental Organization] concern" and that the value of the
Process "may lie more in the principles it champions than in the
blueprint it provides." The issue's third guest contributor is
UN-based journalist Jim Wurst, who weighs the chances, in the wake
of the landmines ban, of States Parties to the Convention on
Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) adopting protocols banning other
"wicked weapons".
March saw agreement at the Conference on Disarmament (CD) on a
programme of work for 1998. But, as Rebecca Johnson observes in her
latest Geneva Update, there is concern that the CD is "still
deadlocked on the politically-charged issues of fissban
negotiations, nuclear disarmament and whether to work on
landmines." Johnson explores the background to the adoption of the
programme and the generally lukewarm reaction to it. She concludes:
"Adoption of this 'lowest common denominator' work programme
demonstrates more clearly than ever the need for a positive new
mandate on disarmament from the international community."
Documents and Sources features material from the CD, the
Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission, a Mine Action Workshop in Ottawa, and
US Congressional testimony on nuclear weapons and nuclear testing.
News Review includes coverage of encouraging developments in
Iraq, political upheaval and reorganisation in Russia, and the
nuclear policy of the new Indian Government.
Disarmament Diplomacy welcomes letters and comments on
all disarmament and non-proliferation issues, and especially
invites suggestions and proposals on present and possible arms
control measures.
© 1998 The Acronym Institute.
Return to top of page
Return to List of Contents
Return to Acronym Main Page