| Acronym Institute Home Page | Calendar | UN/CD | NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |
| CTBT | BWC | CWC | WMD Possessors | About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
Meanwhile, a Federal Government plan billed as a means of contributing to the cause of non-proliferation is incurring the wrath of many Parliamentarians and anti-nuclear and environmental activists. The Chretien Administration intends to burn weapons-grade plutonium from dismantled US and Russian nuclear weapons as a fuel in commercial reactors, and is planning to conduct a feasibility study at a nuclear research facility in Chalk River, Ontario. The scheme, and the trial project, was strongly defended by Foreign Minister Lloyd Axworthy on 14 July: "The only commitment we have made is to undertake certain tests of very small, minute portions... I do not think it represents a real threat to Canada. But nuclear proliferation represents a threat to all mankind. ... We live in a dangerous nuclear world. We have some responsibilities to help in the denuclearizing of that world... We are simply testing to see if we can make a contribution to that issue."
The sincerity, or accuracy, of this claim was questioned by NDP MP Svend Robinson (14 July) who stated angrily: "Canadians do not want our country to become a dumping ground for the world's Cold War plutonium." And in the view of Kristen Ostling of the Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout (14 July): "This nuclear-industry driven project is presented by the Prime Minister and other supporters as a disarmament initiative. In fact, the project will contribute to proliferation by commercializing the use of plutonium."
Editor's note: on 2 September, the US and Canada announceed agreement on the details of a trial project, to be known as Project Parallax. See next issue for details and comment.
Reports: Canada plutonium debate rages, Associated Press, 14 July; US torpedo testing enrages Canadians, Associated Press, 20 July.
© 1999 The Acronym Institute.