| Acronym Institute Home Page | Calendar | UN/CD | NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |
| CTBT | BWC | CWC | WMD Possessors | About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
The same New York Times article also reported that, in late October, Senator Tom Harkin (Democrat - Iowa) had written to Richardson raising the sensational possibility that NIF-tests may violate the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) - the suggestion being that the anticipated momentary release during a NIF detonation of around 15 pounds of TNT might infringe the strict 'zero-yield' requirement of Article I of the test ban. Harkin wrote: "It is troubling that we are planning to ignite thermonuclear explosions at NIF that may violate the…Treaty's ban on nuclear explosions…" This fear, however, is dismissed by Administration officials: the article quoted John Holum, Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, insisting that "we specifically carved out that activity as something we expected to continue under a zero yield treaty."
Report: Energy Dept. said bungled project, Associated Press, January 11; A leading alternative to nuclear tests falters, New York Times, December 21, http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/science/122199sci-laser-facility.html
© 2000 The Acronym Institute.