| This
page with graphics | Disarmament
Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM
Reports |
| Acronym Institute Home Page
| Calendar | UN/CD
|
NPT/IAEA | UK | US | Space/BMD |
| CTBT | BWC
| CWC | WMD Possessors
| About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
Disarmament Documentation
Back to Disarmament Documentation
'A long war', US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, February
4, 2006
'Speech at the 42nd Munich Conference on Security Policy',
February 4, 2006.
Ministers, parliamentarians, ladies and gentlemen. I am very
pleased to be back at this important gathering and to see so many
old friends.
It is sometimes said that America is somewhat unusual among
nations, because most of our citizens trace their origins to
someplace else. To Asia and Africa. The Middle East. Central and
South America. And of course, here in Europe. During America's
Civil War, a Confederate commander said if you took the Germans out
of the Union Army, the South might win easily. A list of
descendents of German immigrants since then would include such
world-famous Americans as President Eisenhower, Elvis, and even
Babe Ruth, to name but a few. I mention this because often when we
talk about relations between the United States and Europe, we tend
to think of two separate entities. But in a real sense we are a
community, with shared histories, common values, and an abiding
faith in democracy.
Today, there is a threat to our community - to our very way of
life. Violent extremism is a danger posed as much to Europe as to
America and elsewhere. And, as during the Cold War, the struggle
ahead promises to be a "long war" - that will cause us all to
recalibrate our strategies, perhaps further adjust our
institutions, and certainly work closely together. We have done a
good deal since the "wake up call" of September 11, 2001. We have
begun a historic transformation of NATO, reached out in partnership
to non-NATO nations, and responded with compassion to the tsunami
in Southeast Asia and the devastating earthquake in Pakistan. We
are helping to battle determined enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq,
and we will need to continue to stay on the offense against
them.
Unlike previous struggles, the enemy today is not a country, or
even one particular organization. While al-Qaeda is the principal
enemy, there are others equally dangerous. Consider that before
September 11, 2001, terrorists:
- Hijacked an Air France jet
- Bombed several airplanes traveling to and from Europe,
including the Lockerbie flight
- Attacked airports in Rome and Vienna, and
- Here in this city, kidnapped and killed 11 Israeli
Olympians
And, since September 11, 2001, when 3,000 people were killed on a
single day, terrorists have murdered hundreds more in places
like:
- Karachi
- Jerusalem
- Bali
- Casablanca
- Istanbul
- Madrid
- Beslan
- Jakarta
- Cairo
- and London
A war has been declared on all of our nations. Our futures depend
on determination and unity in the face of the terrorist threat that
Chancellor Merkel has so correctly labeled "the greatest challenge
to our security in the 21st century." And the world's great
democracies - anchored by NATO - must stay united to meet this
challenge. Have no doubt - the terrorists intend to kill still more
of our people. They have said so.
- An al-Qaeda operative in Afghanistan said of civilians in
Europe and America: "Their wives will be widowed, and their
children will be orphaned".
- A radical cleric said after the London bombings: "I would like
to see the Islamic flag fly, not only over Number 10 Downing
Street, but the whole world".
- And the leader of the Khobar Towers attacks boasted: "We tied
the infidel [a Briton] by one leg [behind the car] … The
infidel's clothing was torn to shreds … We found a Swedish
infidel. [We] cut off his head, and put it on the gate so that it
would be seen by all those entering and exiting. … We found
Filipino Christians … and Hindu engineers and we cut their
throats, too".
No fewer than 18 organizations - loosely affiliated with al-Qaeda -
have conducted terrorist acts in places such as Israel, Saudi
Arabia, Pakistan, Somalia, Algeria, Russia, and Indonesia. And it
is worth noting that those nations were attacked by terrorists even
though none had forces in Iraq. So any argument that Iraq might
have been a trigger is inconsistent with the facts.
According to their own words, they seek to take over governments
from North Africa to Southeast Asia and to re- establish a
caliphate they hope, one day, will include every continent. They
have designed and distributed a map where national borders are
erased and replaced by a global extremist Islamic empire. Today,
they call Iraq the central front in their war against the civilized
world. And they hope to turn it into the same sort of haven for
training and recruitment that Afghanistan once was for al-Qaeda.
That is their strategy. But we and our friends and Allies have a
strategy as well.
- First, to use all elements of national power to try to prevent
them from obtaining weapons of mass destruction
- Second, to defend our homelands, through sharing intelligence,
law-enforcement, and more integrated homeland defense
- And third, to help friendly nations increase their capabilities
to fight terrorism in their own countries
In Afghanistan, as our NATO mission moves south, we must give
Afghans the assistance they need to nurture their new democracy. In
Iraq, the United States and our Allies have sent our best men and
women to help Iraqis build a government that is dramatically
different from the regime it replaced. We must help ensure its new
government succeeds. And in Iran, we must continue to work together
to seek a diplomatic solution to stopping the development of its
uranium enrichment program. The Iranian regime is today the world's
leading state sponsor of terrorism. The world does not want - and
must work together to prevent - a nuclear Iran. While we oppose the
actions of Iran's regime, we stand with the Iranian people who want
a peaceful, democratic future. They have no desire to see the
country they love isolated from the rest of the civilized
world.
In this long war, the enemy has tried to cast the struggle as a
war between the West and the Muslim world. In fact, it is more a
war within the Muslim world. Most of the people in the Middle East
do not share the violent ideology of al-Qaeda or other violent
extremists. They don't want the terrorists to prevail. Many in the
Middle East have been inspired by the example of the some 50
million Muslims in the new democracies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A
recent survey shows that a large and growing number of Muslims
believe freedom can work in their countries, and it shows that
support is declining for al-Qaeda and bin Laden. A survey indicates
that more than 80 percent of Afghans say their country is moving in
the right direction. Only 5 percent have a favorable view of bin
Laden. In Iraq, a growing majority wants a representative
government.
We have an opportunity - an opening that we need to seize - to
help to write a new chapter in the history of freedom while these
enemies are on the defensive. This is - as it has been in earlier
decades - a time to work together closely. No nation can succeed in
the War on Terror without close cooperation with other nations.
Working together, our tasks ahead are to:
- All work to make the Proliferation Security Initiative a
success. Consider how markedly our world would change, overnight,
if a handful of terrorists managed to obtain and launch a chemical,
biological, or radiological weapon in Munich, Paris, or New
York
- To help countries like Georgia train their security forces, and
work with nations in the Caucasus and Central Asia through the
increasingly important Partnership for Peace programs
- And to continue to transform NATO for the 21st Century, invest
in the NATO Response Force, broader common funding, and encourage
NATO to develop an expeditionary culture and capability
This commitment cannot be done on the cheap. It may be easier for
all of us to use our scarce tax dollars to meet urgent needs we all
have at home. But unless we invest in our defense and security, our
homelands will be at risk. Today 3.7 percent of every American tax
dollar goes toward our national defense and the defense of our
friends and allies. Six of our 25 NATO allies spend 2 percent or
more of their GDP on defense, but 19 Allies - 19 - do not even
spend 2 percent. Without the U.S. contribution, NATO nations
collectively spend only 1.8 percent. It is unlikely that these
levels of investment will prove to be sufficient to protect the
free people of our NATO nations in the decades ahead.
And this is happening in the face of the reality that the
availability of weapons of greatly increased lethality is growing.
We all need to consider where this risky trend could take us. In
many ways, this war is different than any we have ever fought. But
in other ways, our situation today resembles that of free nations
in the early days of the Cold War. Over the course of what
President Kennedy called "a long twilight struggle," our countries
have disagreed on some things from time to time. But fortunately
for us, and for our children, we did not lose our will - over many
decades, and through many changes in political leadership in all of
our countries. Our free nations did not waver when the Premier of
the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev, promised to "bury" us. Nor
when he predicted that our grandchildren would live under
Communism. Quite the contrary. Today we live in a world where the
son of Nikita Khrushchev has chosen to become an American citizen.
And where a woman raised in this country's communist East - where
the state decided where you could work, what you could read, and
whether you could pray - is now the newly elected Chancellor of a
united and democratic Federal Republic of Germany.
I'm told that Chancellor Merkel has said, "I did not expect to
live in a free society before I reached the age of retirement". As
we consider those words, we note that the Cold War wasn't won
through fate or luck. Freedom prevailed because our free nations
showed resolve when retreat would have been easier, and showed
courage when concession seemed simpler. Today, our countries have
another choice to make. We could choose to pretend, as some
suggest, that the enemy is not at our doorstep. We could choose to
believe, as some contend, that the threat is exaggerated. But those
who would follow such a course must ask: what if they are wrong?
What if at this moment, the enemy is counting on being
underestimated, counting on being dismissed, and counting on our
preoccupation. Ultimately, history teaches that success depends on
will. So let us today speak with one voice:
- To those who murder children
- To those who kidnap diplomats
- To those who behead aid workers
- To those who slaughter journalists
- And to those who claim the moral high ground for a cause that
is anything but moral
Let us warn them not to mistake periodic differences for disunity,
nor our respect for life as a fear of fighting. Let us continue to
show them that the nations of this great alliance will meet the
great peril of our age. And that liberty, the legacy of our
forefathers and the right of our children, will not, by us, be idly
surrendered or bargained away. Instead it will live and endure for
generations to come.
Source: Munich Conference on Security Policy, http://www.securityconference.de.
Back to the Top of the Page
© 2005 The Acronym Institute.