| This
page with graphics | Disarmament
Diplomacy | Disarmament Documentation | ACRONYM
Reports |
| Acronym Institute Home Page
| Calendar | UN/CD
|
NPT/IAEA | UK | NATO | US |
| Space/BMD | CTBT | BWC
| CWC | WMD Possessors
| About Acronym | Links | Glossary |
Disarmament Documentation
Back to Disarmament Documentation
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on the North Korea
Declaration, 26 June 2008
Remarks to the Travelling Press on the North Korean
Declaration, Secretary Condoleezza Rice, Okura Hotel, Kyoto, Japan,
26 June 2008.
SECRETARY RICE: It is my understanding that the North
Koreans have now handed over their declaration to the Chinese, as
chair of the six-party talks and of the denuclearization working
group. We are expecting that declaration and then that the United
States - the President will say that he is going to begin the
45-day notification period to Congress to delist North Korea from
the terrorism list, and to remove them from the Trading With The
Enemies Act.
I want just to emphasize that the nature of this declaration is one
in which we believe we have through a verification -- sort of
verification principles and a protocol to be worked out -- the
means by which to verify the completeness and the accuracy of this
document. That verification, obviously, will take some time. But,
for instance, in order to verify the plutonium number that the
North Koreans have given, we have been given documents, but we also
are expecting access to the reactor core, to the waste pool. That
just gives you an example of the kind of verification measures that
are coming.
This is a good step forward. The United States and its partners
are expecting, over the next 45 days, to have North Korean
cooperation as we move forward to nail down the elements of
verification, and we will act accordingly. I want to emphasize
something that I said earlier, which is that this is an important
first step, but a first step toward denuclearization, which means
an end to - a verifiable end to all North Korean nuclear programs
and to their - to understand and to account for their actual
nuclear devices or nuclear weapons.
There continue to be questions about the highly enriched uranium
program, as well as North Korean proliferation activities. They
have acknowledged our concerns and we expect that North Korea
understands that it has a responsibility to answer questions and to
provide verification concerning what has happened with their HEU
program and with their proliferation activities.
We have many issues with North Korea. There continue to be
concerns about human rights, about missile proliferation, and there
continues to be concern about the Japanese abduction issue. We have
made very clear to North Korea that we expect North Korea to treat
our ally, Japan, seriously about this very important humanitarian
issue, and that we will continue to encourage Japanese and DPRK
direct negotiation and discussion on this issue. But the United
States will be monitoring those discussions very actively as
well.
So with that, let me take a couple questions.
MR. MCCORMACK: First question.
SECRETARY RICE: Matt, you want to lead?
QUESTION: Sure. This is obviously the beginning, right?
It's not the --
SECRETARY RICE: Right.
QUESTION: -- the end of it. So in the next 45 days - or how
soon in the 45 days do you expect to be getting access to the
reactor core?
SECRETARY RICE: There are verification principles that have
been worked out (inaudible) protocol that's worked out that talks
about access. I think we're making progress on this. And so I don't
mean to suggest that there's a problem here. I think we are making
progress; we'll see. I should note the North Koreans have already
disabled - done many disabling activities at Yongbyon. That's a
good step, because we'd like to see them out of the plutonium
business. We have a lot of questions about a lot of aspects of the
North Korean nuclear program. But the plutonium, which we know they
can make, which they have made, which they restarted and made more,
remains a grave concern for the international community in terms of
both its threat to the region and also, frankly, the proliferation
risk from having made plutonium.
So, the next 45 days are important, but I don't want to suggest
that there are already difficulties. We're making progress and we -
the President - it's just a 45-day clock until it's effective.
QUESTION: I mean -- and you haven't actually seen the
declaration?
SECRETARY RICE: I have not myself. The Chinese have the
declaration.
QUESTION: When -
SECRETARY RICE: There have been consultations prior to
this, so we know the nature of it. We know generally what's in it.
But obviously, it'll be reviewed as well.
QUESTION: Well, when - is there a time set for the next
envoys meeting?
SECRETARY RICE: I don't think that time has been set yet.
QUESTION: Yeah. Have you been invited to visit North Korea
by any of the North Koreans?
SECRETARY RICE: I think I was invited. I'm not sure. Look,
it's --
QUESTION: To play the piano?
SECRETARY RICE: Pardon me?
QUESTION: To play the piano?
SECRETARY RICE: Oh, to play the piano, all right. It's not
time to contemplate that at this point.
Look, there's a - there's a long way to go here. And one thing
that I would emphasize is that delisting and having the North
Koreans come off TWEA still leaves in place U.S. sanctions,
bilateral, multilateral, for proliferation, for human rights. And
before we would contemplate anything further, in terms of political
- steps for political normalization or economic assistance, I think
we'd certainly expect to see more from the North Koreans. So the
fact of the matter is that the North Koreans are disabling. They're
moving forward on verification. And it's been done without, yet,
economic assistance or any major steps on the political front.
Okay.
MR. MCCORMACK: All right. One last one.
SECRETARY RICE: Okay. We'll have one last question.
Yes.
QUESTION: Do you regard the North Korean (inaudible) to
abandon all the nuclear weapons program with this declaration?
SECRETARY RICE: The North Koreans made the claim or made
the commitment to abandon all of their nuclear weapons programs
verifiably and thereby to allow the denuclearization of the Korean
Peninsula during, first, September 2005 and then reiterated it in
February of 2007. And this is, then, one of the implementing
agreements along the way, step-for-step, action-for-action.
We will see. The North Koreans may or may not intend to fully
abandon their nuclear weapons programs. But frankly, this is the
only way we're going to find out, if we keep probing, if we keep
testing, if we continue to have the North Koreans meet their
obligations and we meet ours and, most importantly, doing it in the
context of six parties, not one.
And I want to emphasize, because there's been a lot about U.S.
bilateral discussions with North Korea; well, if you look at an
actual record, you've got, yes, U.S. bilateral discussions with
North Korea, but you've also got Chinese. Probably the most active
channel is China-North Korea. You've got Japan-North Korea. And
you've had Russia-China, Russia-North Korea. Sometimes we find
various geometries helpful. We've had trilaterals -- South Korea,
Japan, the United States. Sometimes we find various geometries
useful within the context of the six-party talks, but all
commitments are to the six parties and by the six parties.
Thanks very much.
Source: US Department of State, www.state.gov.
Back to the Top of the Page